A childs mind is a clean slate waiting to be filled with knowledge

Monroe organises a fund for Conway, and while Chandler makes a very charitable donation, Taviner is forced to write an IOU. Managing to rescue his reputation amongst the relief, he is soon left in deep trouble as unbeknown to him, the money is fake. Gilmore has a hard time containing a vanful of officers desperate to get amongst the conflict and regain some order. As white youths are seen loitering around an Asian owned warehouse, Ackland is taken hostage.

A childs mind is a clean slate waiting to be filled with knowledge

Pinker proved that language is an instinct because all healthy children learn the logic of language in the same way and because the capacity to use language is found in an identifiable part of the brain.

Back to School with Hope & Fear

In other words, children do not learn language because adults teach it to them, but because they are genetically wired to do so. The idea of a human nature has been explored before by philosophers, artists, psychologists, and ethnographers, and Pinker described their work in his earlier books.

Here he builds on and moves beyond the work of the anthropologist Donald E. Everything individuals become can be traced to their environment: According to this model, which can be traced back to the seventeenth century philosopher John Lockeall healthy children have the potential to grow up smart, or musical, or kind, or violent, if only they are brought up that way.

Locke was arguing against the idea that societies should be shaped by divine right or by hereditary rulers; rather, he argued, all people started out equal and free, and should have equal chances to develop their talents.

A childs mind is a clean slate waiting to be filled with knowledge

A related idea is the notion of the noble savage, a term that comes from a seventeenth century poem by John Dryden According to this theory, there is such a thing as human nature, an innate universal personality. This innate nature is good and strong and selfless; any violent or competitive urges humans might feel have been impressed upon them by a cruel modern world.

Legends abound of supposedly peaceful societies in the wilds of undiscovered lands, and these stories can be traced back as far as the European explorers in the New World.

If negative influences for example, violent song lyrics could be eliminated, the natural nobility of humans could be recaptured. The body is a machine and acts according to physical laws of electricity or chemistry. Within or above that body is the mind, or what some religions would call the soul.

If the mind were truly blank, he reasons, it would not be able to learn from its environment, because there would be no way for it to know how to learn rather like a computer hard drive that cannot run even the most basic software without a functioning operating system.

Of greater interest to the author is explaining why so many people have persisted in clinging to the old ideologies in spite of scientific evidence. Frequently, scientists who present evidence that human hard-wiring affects human behavior are denounced as racists, sexists, even Nazis.

Pinker believes that the greatest motivation for those who deny the existence of a universal human nature is well-intentioned fear.

If, for example, it were shown incontrovertibly that intelligence is determined by genetics, would that not lead to stratification along race or gender lines?

If it could be shown that one race or gender is genetically more or less intelligent than another, would that not sanction various forms of discrimination and undo decades and centuries of movement toward equality?

Pinker tells horrifying anecdotes of scientists in several fields who presented research demonstrating how natural selection might shape human nature or how genetics might shape a human mind, only to be met with angry, fearful, and sometimes violent attacks primarily from other academics having much more to do with politics than with science.

Pinker claims that these fears are unjustified for several reasons. For one thing, saying that genetics affects intelligence is not the same thing as saying it determines intelligence. Put another way, biology might make a trait probable, but not inevitable. Further, observations about broad groups of people are not illuminating when considering individuals.

Pinker repeats the lesson offered in earlier works that the concept of race is nearly meaningless for geneticists; there is no more observable difference in the genetic code between Caucasians and Africans, for example, than between any two randomly selected individuals.

Men and women are genetically different and difference in abilities can be attributed in general terms to the sexes—it can be said that men are better at solving word problems and women are better spellers—but even the casual nonscientific observer knows that some women are better than some men at word problems, and some men spell well.

Most importantly, those who fear that science will uncover a universal human nature must keep in mind the difference between moral and natural.

Even if rape or cheating could be shown to be biologically natural, the acts would still be immoral. In these chapters, perhaps the most fascinating in the book, he fiercely takes on gender feminists, the Christian Right, child psychologists, postmodernists, and others, making a plea they not misuse science in an attempt achieve ethical goals.

Pinker points out hypocrisy and errors in the writings of other scientists, including James Watson, Richard Lewontin, and the late Stephen Jay Gould.

Pinker is convinced that a universal human nature is present and scientifically verifiable and writes passionately about the potential harm caused by those who disagree with his position.

A childs mind is a clean slate waiting to be filled with knowledge

However, there is no venom in him, and he uses humor to disagree agreeably. Several reviewers have found that Pinker overstates how much science knows about the mind.

Pinker might disagree with their findings, but he welcomes the conversation so long as it is based on science, not on emotion, ideology, or politics.

New Scientist September 7, New Statesman September 16, New York 35 September 30, Publishers Weekly August 12, Science September 27, The Times Literary Supplement, September 27,p.Over the past decade, digital tools and mobile platforms have rocketed journalism to a universe of innovation, interactivity and immediacy once unimaginable.

The Human mind as a "tabula rasa"

Find listings of daytime and primetime ABC TV shows, movies and specials. Get links to your favorite show pages. Archives and past articles from the Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News, and caninariojana.com Clara Barton, founder of the American Red Cross. I may be compelled to face danger, but never fear it, and while our soldiers can stand and fight, I .

网易云音乐是一款专注于发现与分享的音乐产品,依托专业音乐人、dj、好友推荐及社交功能,为用户打造全新的音乐生活。. Proponents of tabula rasa generally disagree with the doctrine of innatism which holds that the mind is born already in possession of certain knowledge. Generally, proponents of the tabula rasa theory also favour the "nurture" side of the nature versus nurture debate when it comes to aspects of one's personality, social and emotional behaviour, knowledge and sapience.

The Bill (series 18) - Wikipedia